FTMO vs FundedNext 2026: complete comparison, which prop firm to choose?

Quick answer

As of May 2026, FTMO wins this comparison against FundedNext with a rating of 4.6/5 vs 4.5/5. FTMO benefits from a solid track record since 2015, cTrader support alongside MT4/MT5, and proven reliability with thousands of traders. FundedNext remains an attractive alternative thanks to unrestricted news trading, the Express model for faster capital access, and greater flexibility on consistency rules.

FTMO
2-step challenge · Since 2015 · cTrader
4.6
Our rating
Our pick
VS
FundedNext
Stellar / Express · Since 2022
4.5
Our rating

Full comparison table

Criteria FTMO FundedNext
Overall rating4.6 / 54.5 / 5
RegulationNoneNone
HeadquartersPrague, Czech RepublicUAE
Founded20152022
Access model2-step challenge (FTMO Challenge + Verification)1-2 step challenge (Stellar / Express)
Profit split80% → 90% (scaling)80% → 90% (scaling)
Maximum account$200,000$200,000
Daily drawdown5%5%
Overall drawdown10%10% (Stellar) / 6% (Express)
PlatformsMT4, MT5, cTraderMT4, MT5
InstrumentsForex, indices, metals, cryptoForex, indices, metals, crypto
News tradingRestricted (±2 min)Allowed
Consistency ruleYesVaries by plan
Min. trading days4 per phase5 (Stellar) / 10 (Express)

Criterion-by-criterion analysis

Criterion 01
Track record and reliability
FTMO has been operating since 2015 and has paid out millions of dollars to traders. FundedNext, founded in 2022, is much newer and doesn't yet have the same track record. FTMO's longevity is a significant trust factor.
✓ Advantage FTMO
Criterion 02
Trading platforms
FTMO offers MT4, MT5 and cTrader, providing more choice for traders. FundedNext is limited to MT4 and MT5. cTrader is valued for its modern interface, advanced analysis tools and fast execution.
✓ Advantage FTMO
Criterion 03
News trading
FundedNext allows news trading without restrictions. FTMO prohibits opening positions 2 minutes before and after major economic announcements. For traders who exploit announcement volatility, FundedNext is better suited.
→ Advantage FundedNext
Criterion 04
Challenge model flexibility
FundedNext offers two distinct models: Stellar (1-2 steps) and Express (faster access). FTMO only offers a 2-step challenge. This variety allows FundedNext to cater to different trader profiles.
→ Advantage FundedNext
Criterion 05
Consistency rule
FTMO enforces a strict consistency rule across all plans. At FundedNext, this rule varies by plan, offering more flexibility for traders with diverse trading styles.
→ Advantage FundedNext
Criterion 06
Minimum trading days
FTMO requires only 4 trading days per phase, compared to 5 days minimum at FundedNext (Stellar) and 10 days (Express). Fewer day requirements allow for faster challenge completion.
✓ Advantage FTMO

Who should choose FTMO vs FundedNext?

Choose FTMO if...
FTMO
  • You want a prop firm with a long and proven track record (since 2015)
  • You trade on cTrader and want to keep that platform
  • You prefer a well-established and recognized challenge process
  • You want to complete your challenge quickly (4 days minimum per phase)
  • You don't trade economic announcements (news trading restricted)
  • You value stability and reputation above all
Choose FundedNext if...
FundedNext
  • You use news trading as your main strategy
  • You want to choose between multiple challenge models (Stellar / Express)
  • You prefer a more flexible consistency rule depending on the plan
  • You are comfortable with MT4/MT5 and don't need cTrader
  • You are looking for a prop firm with flexible conditions

Final verdict

Our verdict

FTMO wins thanks to its track record, cTrader and proven reliability

FTMO wins this comparison with a rating of 4.6/5 vs 4.5/5 for FundedNext. Its track record since 2015, cTrader support alongside MT4 and MT5, a minimum of only 4 trading days per phase, and a solidly established reputation make it the most reliable prop firm in this matchup.

FundedNext retains important advantages in flexibility: unrestricted news trading, choice between Stellar and Express models, and variable consistency rule. It is an excellent alternative for traders seeking more flexible conditions or who exploit economic announcement volatility.

Visit FTMO →

Sources and methodology

This comparison is based on real tests conducted by our analyst team, consultation of official websites, analysis of terms and conditions, and reading user reviews on Trustpilot and specialized forums. Our full methodology is detailed on our methodology page. Last verified: May 2026.

Frequently asked questions

FTMO is slightly better with a rating of 4.6/5 compared to 4.5/5 for FundedNext. FTMO benefits from a track record since 2015, cTrader support, and proven reliability. FundedNext remains attractive for its flexibility: news trading allowed, Express model for faster access, and variable consistency rule.
The main differences are track record (FTMO since 2015, FundedNext since 2022), platforms (FTMO offers MT4, MT5 and cTrader, FundedNext only MT4 and MT5), news trading (restricted at FTMO, allowed at FundedNext) and challenge models (FTMO offers a single 2-step challenge, FundedNext offers Stellar and Express).
Neither is regulated by an official financial authority. FTMO is based in Prague (Czech Republic) and FundedNext in the UAE. Trust is based on each firm's reputation and track record, and FTMO has the advantage of a longer history.
Both prop firms offer an identical profit split: 80% base with progression up to 90% through their respective scaling plans. On this criterion, there is no significant difference between FTMO and FundedNext.
FundedNext allows news trading without any restrictions. FTMO prohibits opening positions 2 minutes before and 2 minutes after major economic announcements. For traders who use news trading, FundedNext is clearly superior on this point.